> Olin wrote:
> > This type of circuit is somewhat of a kludge.  Wanting
> > an edge to glitch converter is usually a symptom of bad
> > design elsewhere.


James Williams wrote:
> The state of these two signals as a minimun Tw of 0.5us.
> The pic processor can not handle this time requirement.
> Even when polling.  So I need a circuit that can do the
> job faster.
> Unless there is a better way of doing this.

How about counting 40MHz signal through time-gates formed
by these two signals? You can quickly store counter's values
to PIC RAM and analyze them late.

   Mike.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body