>Do you actually read this list? Expecially posts that
>directly mention you?

Yes, but I had sent that reply, before I got around to the one you sent. I
sort the PIClist mails into separate boxes, by the tags, which I read in an
order that seems sensible to follow threads, as tags get changed when things
go off the original topic, and the mail I sent was on a tag that I look at
before the tag on the message you sent.


>> Check out the comments in Fr MacGhees

>Just a detail, "Written by Fr. Thomas McGahee"

Agreed, I made a spelling mistake, just like my spelling checker claims you
did in your email.

>> I have attached the file I mention, so you can see what I mean.
>
>No you haven't, thus no I can't. You [ahem] 'attached,' again, same as
>four days ago, the *outdated* file that immediately *precedes* the one
>with the charge pump comment. You remember, the file that there was a
>discission about whether a mailing list archive should or shouldn't be an
>'oudated ftp server'? I guess not. :/
>
>But thank Creator that the list archives now have Yet Another Copy [tm] of
>that file just in case every other copy on the planet suddenly disappears
>for no apparent reason. :)

Well in the past I have seen that comment in the file, and I suspect it was
an earlier version than the one I sent as the attachment. I have just
assumed the comments stayed in! However you have now posted a URL where the
latest version can be obtained, which I did not have, and I knew that the
URL in the file itself was invalid as Fr. Thomas McGahee's website had
closed due to his changing circumstances. In the meantime I have posted
working code - as far as I can ascertain from the revision comments in the
newer file you point at, the only change is comments (not changes to the
working code) regarding the charge pump.


>Have a :) day!

And you.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics