On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:04:46 -0800, Andrew Warren wrote:

Igor Pokorny wrote:
>
>> much better would be when a bit symbol represents a bit in certain
>> byte as is usual in some C compilers ... writing ....
>> BSF  RP0 ..... should be clear for anybody
>
>    I missed the start of this thread, so perhaps this has already
>    been covered... But I assume that everyone who's using MPASM
>    already does:
>
>        #define RP0 STATUS,5    // or whatever
>
>    Once defined, RP0 can then be set just as you suggested, with:
>
>        BSF RP0
>

I do something similar. To keep compatability with Microchip's
mnemonics, though, I define my own _RP0 etc to include the register
and bit number.

In my code, "RP0" is always just the bit number while "_RP0" has both
the register and the bit number.


Regards, Bob

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body