>And IMHO tools that have not yet caught up with at least the
>12F's are rather slow in doing so, which means that they
>probably should not be used in a professional environment ;)

Unfortunately I would say that as the original poster is quoting a 16C84
then they are not even in the hobby environment, let alone a professional
environment.

I had been considering also pointing at the 18F series, but felt that the
16F was going to be a big enough leap in technology from where they were
starting. However thank you for pointing out the other alternatives that I
had not had the time to investigate.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body