On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 16:31, Ned Konz wrote:

> Remember, this is assembly language (and a rather simple-minded
> assembler, too). If you want type checking, use a higher-level
> language or a smarter assembler.

Since I'm trying to understand the architecture, it seems that assembly
language is better for now.  I'll move to to an HLL later.  What
assembler would be a smarter assembler????  I had thought that MPASM set
the standard (I got chewed out earlier for using gpasm :-)

Jon

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics