On Sunday 09 March 2003 08:32 am, RADAR Engineering Team wrote:
> Because of time constraints it does not look like switching to the
> PIC18F8720 is a usable solution.  It does offer everything that we
> would need and more.  But, the circuit has already been layout and
> etch for an 84 pin TQFP.  I have read through the data sheets for
> the 17C766

The 17C766 comes in: 84 PLCC, 84 CERQUAD, 80 TQFP

Are you *sure* that you're using an 84 pin TQFP and not a PLCC?

The 18F8720 comes in: 80 TQFP only.

--
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics