I did a 12F629 in AutoTRAX yesterday (after beeing a "user" of
AutoTRAX for aprox 20 min.) I have done 12F629 in Eagle before
after beeing a user of Eagle for a couple of month.

I don't think I'd been able to make the part in Eagle at all, if not
having a guide I found on the web.

AutpTRAX was, in this respect, much easier to grasp as-is.

*BUT*, right now, I can start AutoTRAX, but when loading my simple
example schematic, I get a memory access error "The memory could
not be "read"" on address 0x0000011c... P-III, 800Mhz, 128Mb, W2K.

Jan-Erik.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Veys [mailto:nick@VEYS.COM]
Sent: den 5 mars 2003 06:38
To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [EE]: Eagle vs. AutoTRAX (derailing to editing parts
w/each)


Hmm, granted the editor is somewhat un-user-friendly, but a simple
copy-paste gets parts duplicated and stuff, maybe I dunno what a "tweak"
exactly consists of.

Does anyone have any experience editing parts in AutoTRAX?  Is it
easier, harder, just plain different?

nick@veys.com / www.veys.com

> > I think he meant the AutoTRAX parts editor sucked, the
> Eagle editor is
> > super easy.
>
> ACtually, I did mean Eagle, but it's the librarian that's bad
> (the editor is fine). Trying to take a simple part like an
> LM374 and tweak it to make another part is far more difficult
> than it should be.
>
> -->Neil

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.