For what I do, PICC coding without bothering w/simulation or ICD, it's
100% complete and perfectly stable.

It finally has a semi-modern project interface, adding object files and
source files cause them to be compiled in or linked when applicable.
Very complete (for me).  I uninstalled MPLab 5 months ago, I hated that
old decrepid piece of shoot and love MPLab 6.

nick@veys.com / www.veys.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pic microcontroller discussion list
> [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of Dave Dilatush
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 12:21 PM
> To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: [PIC]: MPLAB opinions sought
>
>
> I've been using the 16-bit versions of MPLAB for several
> years, and have so far put off switching over to MPLAB v6.10
> out of a general dislike for being the first to try out new-
> and potentially buggy- software.
>
> To those of you who've been using v6.10: Do you like it?  Is
> there anything particular you find about v6.10 that's
> markedly superior (or inferior) to v5.70?  Have you had any
> serious problems with v6.10?
>
> At some point I'm sure I'll want to start doing all new work
> in the 32-bit version of MPLAB; I'm just trying to decide
> whether to go ahead and start now, or wait until it's a
> little more "mature".
>
> Soliciting all opinions, of which I'm sure there must be many...
>
> Dave D.
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply
> us! email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body