Agreed.  Most photo processing places can do the same thing for film based
photographs as well.  But I honestly believe that prevention is better than
cure - esp. when it comes to digitally "doctoring" photo images.

Call me a purist.

Rgs
Ian.

-----Original Message-----
From: pic microcontroller discussion list
[mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of Jan-erik Soderholm (QAC)
Sent: Sunday, 2 March 2003 3:12 am
To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Poptronics no more :-(


Most photo editing software has some kind
of read eye correction function. The one I'v used
was in "ACDSee", and it worked just OK.
Jan-Erik Soderholm

Ian McLean wrote:
>My advise is to leave the gimmicky red eye reduction alone.  It works by
>attempting to reduce the size of your pupil before the real flash.
>The only way to remove red eye completely is to have the flash off to the
>side of the camera.  Normal flash - no catatonic seizures.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body