Yes,  I too am interested in getting their version 2.0 but they have yet =
to respond to my e-mail queries,   Seems like all they are interested in =
is for people to buy their $300+CAD program without much knowledge  =
about its "functionality"!

    For example, which PIC's does it not support, and which ones it =
does.  A clear decisive statement is not only necessary but mandatory, =
for me.

Bobish.
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: moonshadow=20
  To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
  Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:41 PM
  Subject: Re: [PIC] Crownhill Pic Basic Plus?.


  Subject: Re: [PIC] Crownhill Pic Basic Plus?.

  I was actually interested in any users opinion of Crownhill's own PIC =
BASIC
  PLUS compiler of which they are about to issue version 2.0.  They =
claim it
  has more 'functionality' than MELABS PICBASIC Pro of which I think you
  speak. Two different animals :-)

  John.

  --
  http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
  [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads


--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads