Well well, despite all this recoding, and recommenting... guess what, still no
work :-( My first question is that is it possible that when I was trying to
code the routines manually (instead of through the MSSP), could I have damaged
the pins of the TC74? Even though I was getting successful ACK's at that
point...
anyway, I'm really running out of options here. Almost considering ordering
some more TC74's just to make sure that they aren't the problem. I have
attached my section of code that I am using. The first function, TGetTemp, is
what is called from my main routine.

Any help, as always, is appreciated.

Jai

Quoting "Alan B. Pearce" <A.B.Pearce@RL.AC.UK>:

> > But with ASM in PIC's, I am just trying to focus my attention
> >on becoming familiar with as much as I can before I work on
> >my coding style(s). I agree that commenting is an integral
> >part to coding, it's just not everyone can do it all at once.
>
> You will find it a lot easier to get something going properly by writing
> just comments as a pseudo code to get the program flow correct to start
> with, and then intersperse the actual code in between the comments. This way
> it does not matter which language you are using. It may become apparent as
> you write the pseudo code that certain parts are better in an HLL, and
> others better in assembler, but at the pseudo code stage this does not
> matter.
>
> I have found that doing things this way also help to identify portions that
> are best suited to a procedure or subroutine, rather than inline code.
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
> mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu
>




----------------------------------------
This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu