> you really wrote it from scratch without using
> bison/yacc/flex/anything - this must have taken a lot of work).

I am not very fond of those toolkits, mainly because the error messages
are often very bad. And for the very simple grammar of Jal the amount of
work in the lex/parse part is small. There real work is in the reduction
of HLL constructs to simpler constructs, the register allocation and
(still to de finished!) intelligent handling of code page settings.

> I have a small question: Where are the include files that go
> with jal ?

I guess you got the Jal compiler source from Source Forge? That is still
'under construction'. I have a download at my Jal page
http://www.voti.nl/jal that includes the libraries. There is also a lot
of work from others at the Jallist webpage (files section), and do check
Vasile's and Stef's pages.

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads