> > If you need faster pulses than that, try a PWM channel - I think you
can
> > get a pulse per cycle that way, with no software overhead once
started.
>
> The PWM resolution is Q cycles, not instruction cycles.  You can get two
> pulses per instruction cycle, or frequency of Fosc/2.

I just got this back and realized this statement is wrong.  The duty cycle
resolution is indeed Q cycles, but the period is set by timer 2 which
counts instruction cycles.  The fastest you can get is Fosc/4 with 1/4,
1/2, and 3/4 duty cycle.


*****************************************************************
Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts
(978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads