Hi,


Scott Dattalo wrote:
<snip>
>Not wanting to leave good enough alone, I dove into the CRC16
calculation
>again. I found another implementation that also takes only 17-cycles.
Oh
>well. But what's interesting, is I found a way to express the CRC16
>algorithm in a very simple way that's useful for high level languages:
<snip>

For some reason I missed this thread ( and Scotts original post ) but
it's never to
late for catching up :). Anyway, interesting expression. I left the crc
stuff
on the backburner for a while but crc-32 is luring me to take another
stab, not
that I'll ever have the insightfullness that Scott has but I might
provide some
neat ideas :).

So if time permits an crc-32 should be added to this list sometimes in
the future.
This could be useful for tcp/ip implementations, as far as I know
current implemenations
does not compute the full crc32 for the outgoing message.


/Tony

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu