Roman, after reading your post "RE: [PIC]: Shift
registers", sent on Saturday, January 11, 2003 12:45 PM,
I asked our radio-market (kind of flee-market) guys
about prices of 74LS595 shift regs and their Soviet
clones in similar quantities.
   So I meant exactly 74LS595.
   No "language problem": Olin had blocked this
very useful thing last summer. :-)
   My reply to Dwayne Reid was not "that it couldn't
be done etc". It was about to prove the idea: If you
need more I/Os, then just use PIC with more pins,
not add extra I/O chips to 8-pin PIC.

   Mike.

Roman Black wrote:
> Well Mike, I have a memory of posting about the
> 3c and you replying that it couldn't be done etc,
> then you made another post;
>
> >    Some psychedelic effect was achieved, on "I GOT
> > PLENTY O' NUTTIN' " I recalled 74LS595  shift regs
> > 3c US each. :-)
>
> Seems to be an obvious dig? Maybe this is a language
> problem? Exactly what did you mean by the above??

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body