I second that. And besided IAR cost over $2000 for one license.  I have
the 16x series IAR C compiler.  I can tell you that it is not worth it's
cost at all.  And if you want to upgrade for the 18 devices you have to
pay another $2000.

I my opinion it is an overpriced peace of software.  I think HiTech is
better than IAR.

Just my 2 cents.

Regards,

James.

P.S.  Although I have the C compilers, I tend to find myself programming
in assembly in the end because of effency and code space and the lack of
support for array of function pointers or jump tables as I call them.
Which is a very useful thing to do.

-----Original Message-----
From: pic microcontroller discussion list
[mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of Andy Kunz
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:55 PM
To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Are there any C++ Compilers for PICs?

DONGLEWARE ALERT!

Preserve your investment - buy only software which doesn't require a
dongle
to run!

Andy


At 03:59 PM 1/10/03 -0500, you wrote:
>At 03:51 PM 1/10/03 -0500, you wrote:
>>That is, are there any compilers (free or otherwise)  that support
objects?
>
>IAR, for the PIC18 series is one.
>
>http://www.iar.com/
>
>Best regards,
>
>Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the
reward"
>speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers:
http://www.trexon.com
>Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:
http://www.speff.com
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
>email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body