> There's a good site, with a lot of info on this (in english) http://www.feb.se Interesting site. English speaking readers would be best to enter it at - http://www.feb.se/index_int.htm While this is essentially an anti-EM site it seems to be responsible and present information form all perspectives. Articles such as this one, referenced from the above site, are why I say that the Jury is still out and that practising prudent avoidance is STILL prudent. One would hope that anyone spending some 4.5 million euros (I think the cost was) on a study, would have some desire to present an objective and accurate result. Maybe not. While I'm sure there will be any number of people setting out to show why this study is incorrect, and indeed this is how science SHOULD work, in the mean time the outcome is still uncertain. Russell McMahon (If I keep saying the same thing in slightly different ways in enough posts then maybe a few otherwise fence-sitters will decide to be at least a little more careful :-) ) -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu