Mike Morris wrote:
> Using a Linux or other boot loader such as LILO or
> GRUB is an option, but unnecessary. The Win2k
> boot loader will happily boot to either Win98 or Win2k.
> The fact that Win98 is the first partition has no effect
> what so ever on Win2k reliability.
....
> There is certainly no reliability issues with having both
> partitions visible and accessible to both OSes.
...
> For maximum compatibility, I'd stick with FAT32 for both
> partitions unless you need NTFS features.

   Do I need NTFS features? If I don't - for what heck
do I need Win2000? I absolutely needn't common
for all users disk C:.  Especially taking into account
that some application (not mine apps) explicitly require
to be installed on C:.

   Mike.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body