Thank you.

I'll try it.

   Mike.

Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
> >    As for me, dual Win2K and Win98/95 is a pointless
> > idea. Win98/95 require first partition be FAT, if I'm not
> > mistaken. With FAT - first partition Win2K can't be
> > reliable. And all the mess with two Windows folders.
> >
>
> Not a problem at all, if you use eg LILO. It is able to
> change partitions dynamically at the startup...
> Below is the sample from lilo.conf taken form one of
> my multiboot machines it hides the Win98 partition
> when booting Win2k, and hides Win2k partition when
> booting Win98. Works perfectly...

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body