Dale Botkin wrote:
>
> Or just install some more memory?  If you must run Windows, 98 is far
> better than 95, and 2000 is far better than 98.  As it is a Micro$loth
> product, though, your hardware has to keep up.  You simply cannot expect a
> new M$ OS to run well on old hardware.  Never has happened, never will.


Why does my hardware need to do anything new??
This offends me. :o)

If I own a perfectly functional 10 year old hammer
why the f%^$ should I be forced to upgrade (ie pay
money) to buy the latest hammer every 2 years just
so microsoft can get constantly richer at my expense?

The fact is that on the SAME hardware (which I have
already paid for), the '98 version works much worse
than the '95 version. So now you're saying I should
spend more money improving my PC so M$ new software
will work as good as it used to do anyway?? ;o)

Come on Dale, this is like saying I MUST upgrade to
18F pic so it will work as fast as my 16F84 always
did, and M$ get paid for all the "upgrading"...
-Roman

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads