Wagner Lipnharski wrote: > > +6v (battery) > > ---------------------*------------------------------- > > | > > BC327 | L1=470uH > > ----, E ( <1ohm ) > > C|----R---------B Q1 > > | 2k2 C > > | | > > S|----R-----------|-----------------, > > | 270 ohm | | > > | | A | > > | *----L1------*----|---*-----, > > PIC | | | | | | > > | ,----------|------------* | - SOL COIL > > | | | | | ^ | > > | R | | | | | > > | | | CS | '-----* > > V|-----* - 470uF| | | > > | | ^ | | C > > ----' R 1N5819 | | '-------B Q2 > > | scho | | E BC337 > > | | | | > > ----------*----------*------------*--------------*--- > > GND > What is the PIC VCC in the above circuit? > If it is +5V, then Q1 will be always active, no matter what. It would only > cut if VBE would be lower than 0.6V, with +5V at VCC, the most the PIC can > deliver via the 2k2R is 4.95V, so, at least 1.05V will be Q1 VBE. Yes I should have been more specific, the "6v battery" is the PIC Vdd voltage, probably two 3v cells and a series diode to make it about 5.5v. >the 2k2R suggests 2mA as Base current, at best > Beta=80, Q1 will be conducting around 180mA maximum. Not so, i've recently done a lot of testing of BC327 in buck regulators, and even at Ib=1mA Vce=0.2v@100mA and even better at Ib=2mA of course. This buck cap charger is *designed* to use a small current from the battery, if the pulse on period is correctly short enough the current drawn from the battery (Q1 Ic) should be 30mA or even less. So 1mA to 2mA Ib is about right for hard saturation. > If its load is lower > than 33 ohms (L1, CS, COIL), then Q1 will not saturate and its VCE will > heat it up. No, because it is a buck switch and the Ic current is a function of L1 inductance and pulse length. > The 270 ohms resistor suggests that 16mA will be injected at Q2 base, is > that right? 10mA+ is about right, BC337 Ib=10mA Vce=0.1v@800mA, he said the solenoid coil is about 500mA so I allowed a decent margin. > what is the reason for a buck charge to the cap to +6V? > A simple resistor woudn't do the same job? His original requirement was for a way to PULSE a solenoid (drawer latch) and the whole circuit to run from a very small battery that had limited current ability and a small total capacity. The buck circuit should be close to 90% efficient to charge the cap, a resistor is simpler but much less efficient. This may equate to 3x more drawer openings before the battery is flat and allows more flexibility to reduce battery current drain and reduce total cap charging time. Since the PIC is already available the cost is only one inductor, a diode and two resistors more than using a resistor to charge the cap. > I guess the battery voltage is not +6V, isn't it? Correct, the voltage is two 3v cells and whatever needed to run the PIC, I assumed a drop diode as this is a micropower circuit. -Roman -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu