> However the world has moved to using GPS to globally > distribute accurate time. It is just FARRRRR more reliable. Is it cheaper? Thanks, Tony ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Rolf" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [PIC]: How to obtain the official US time clock? > CHU does have a computer readable output > http://inms-ienm.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/time/chuhistory.html > > "The warble tone at seconds 31 to 39 allow any computer with a > Bell 103 compatible 300 bps modem to receive and decode an > accurate source of time." > > Germany also has a standard time broadcast as does Japan. > > However the world has moved to using GPS to globally > distribute accurate time. It is just FARRRRR more reliable. > > Olin Lathrop wrote: > > > > > I really need to design a product that knows the official U.S. time, > > aside > > > from other features. Can someone tell me what is required for the > > hardware > > > and software to acquire the official time? And what kind of connections > > are > > > required? > > > > There are several ways to do this, but you need to first decide what > > accuracy you require. If the gizmo already has an internet connection, > > then the contacting a NNTP server requires no additional hardware. There > > are other options: > > > > 1 - Have the user set it occasionally and use a real time clock in > > between. > > > > 2 - Decode the WWVL long wave broadcasts. These are designed for this > > WWVB is the 60kHz station > WWVH is HF station in Hawaii > http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/stations/wwvb.html > > > purpose, but your hardware is susceptable to antenna orientation and > > distance from Boulder. Here in MA we are 2000 miles from Boulder and > > placement and orientation of automatic clocks makes a big difference. I > > have two automatic clocks, and they only seem to pick up the signal at > > night, sometimes. > > I'm up here in Edmonton (53N 113W), and my OSI clock picks up the signal > at all appointed check times (day and night). Antenna placement and > orientation is CRITICAL to reliable reception (no nearby fluorescent > lights or light dimmers) > > > 3 - Decode WWV broadcast. These are at several shortwave frequencies. > > I know 10MHz is one of them, and I think there are also broadcasts at > > 2.5MHz, 5MHz, and 15MHz, but I'm not sure. These may be more difficult to > > & 20Mhz > http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/stations/wwv.html > 10,000 W on 5, 10, and 15 MHz; and 2500 W on 2.5 and 20 MHz > > > decode, but the coverage should be wider. I'm not totally sure they even > > have encoded data on them. > > They do. > "The modulation level is 50 percent for the steady tones, > 50 percent for the BCD time code, ..." > > > > > 4 - Canada also broadcasts a time standard. The radio station is called > > CHU if I remember right. I don't know whether it contains coded > > information that a micro can use. > > It does. See opening paragraph > > Robert > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList > mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu > -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu