Olin Lathrop wrote:
> ...Well, did it work?  Or do you not consider it worth your=20
> time to chase this either?

   Your contribution to the List is great. But this kind of=20
questions will look much more weighty, if you will provide=20
not only neat technical support, but will do some common=20
things: mention the author of the post you are replying to,
for example.
   If you expect for human-like feedback, you are to act=20
as human, not robot, I think.
   (Mentioning the author also helps to track the thread)

   Best wishes.
   Mike.



> >     Why not actually try assembling some code, so you'll know for
> >     sure?
>=20
> Because I've gotten used to the h'FF' syntax and don't have a problem.
I
> was only pointing out a potential problem I saw, and did qualify it
with
> "as far as I know".  If someone wants to know for sure, let THEM do
the
> homework.
>=20
> Maybe my manual is old (didn't check that either.  You can if you
really
> care.), but on page 91 of DS33014G is shows the H'FF' and 0xFF
syntaxes as
> the only two choices for specifying hexadecimal constants assuming hex
> isn't the default radix.
>=20
> >  Here, I'll write some for you:
> >
> >         list p=3Dpic16C54
> >         movlw 0ffh
> >         end
>=20
> Well, did it work?  Or do you not consider it worth your time to chase
> this either?

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu