> You appear to have the dread "quoted printable" set

What does it mean? I'll look into it...

> Sherlock Holmes tells us that therefore the code is wrong!=20
> (probably :-) )

Code is wrong! ;-)

> Most probable cause is that you haven't allowed for the time=20
> spent in the ISR when reloading the counter.

No, that's not it. I chose TMR2 where there is no need to reload any
counters. Compare value PR2 is loaded only once when initializing
interrupts.

But datasheet says: "Timer2 increments from 00h until it matches PR2 and
then resets to 00h on the next increment cycle."

So, instead of PR2 value 250 I should use 249.

Am I right?

Tauno

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body