Yes but I think its much better to turn it round a bit and make the vehicles
assailant have to think about damage to themselves if they damage your
car......."the best defence is an offense"principle hold true very often


Jonathan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pic microcontroller discussion list
> [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of William Chops Westfield
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 November 2002 9:07 AM
> To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: [OT]: Dude, where's my car ? Oh, that green guy's got it
>
>
> I said this a while ago.  When you're implementing your car
> security device,
> you have to have a real clear understanding of whether you're
> preventing the
> car from being stolen, or preventing things from being stolen
> from the car.
> A car, having glass windows, is fundamentally rather unsecurable.
>  If someone
> wants to get in, they can, and anything removable inside the car is gone.
> Protecting the car itself from being stolen is compartively easy, but you
> have to understand that THAT is all you are doing...
> Protecting a car from being damaged is just about impossible...
>
> BillW
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
> (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics