From PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU Fri Nov 15 10:51:59 2002 Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id A24F42013C; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:51:59 -0800 Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.007DD3C3@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:37:52 -0500 Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 6970 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:37:45 -0500 Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 7238; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:35:44 -0500 Received: from out002.verizon.net [206.46.170.141] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via TCP with SMTP ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:35:43 EST X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by out002.verizon.net Received: from djm ([151.199.97.5]) by out002.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.09 201-253-122-126-109-20020611) with ESMTP id <20021115183542.KVDC12845.out002.verizon.net@djm> for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:35:42 -0600 References: <966157FC-F8AB-11D6-9988-000A27A90B06@sdalcorn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at out002.verizon.net from [151.199.97.5] at Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:35:41 -0600 Message-ID: <002601c28cd5$cf2c39e0$0a01a8c0@djm> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:35:40 -0500 Reply-To: pic microcontroller discussion list Sender: pic microcontroller discussion list From: "Dennis J. Murray" Subject: Re: [PIC]:failed data location? To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU X-RCPT-TO: Status: R X-UIDL: 277600707 X-Evolution-Source: pop://mailinglist%40farcite.net@mail.farcite.net/ X-Evolution: 00000790-0000 Thanks, Sean! You're right, of course. And, as I mentioned to Roman, I'll remedy that issue immediately! These chips are just too cheap not to go Industrial! Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean Alcorn - PIC Stuff" To: Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:04 AM Subject: Re: [PIC]:failed data location? > > I would highly recommend using the industrial temp part and making > > absolutely sure your supply cannot dip. And as Dale said, we will > > always > > have failures. I always hated building a few of something and getting > > that > > one part. Always casts a shroud of doubt on the design. > > There is not that much difference in price between "Industrial" Temp > and "Extended" Temp versions. > > We only use extended temp PICs in our applications for this reason. > > Cheers, > > Sean > > -- > http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different > ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. > > -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.