From PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU Fri Nov 15 07:25:25 2002 Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id A1E5133F00B4; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:25:25 -0800 Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <7.007DC94D@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:11:20 -0500 Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 3595 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:05:08 -0500 Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 1455; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:04:52 -0500 Received: from host06.ipowerweb.com [12.129.206.106] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via TCP with ESMTP ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:04:51 EST X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by host06.ipowerweb.com Received: from c18594.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au ([211.28.34.189] helo=sdalcorn.com) by host06.ipowerweb.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 18CivT-0002FK-00 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 08:02:35 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host06.ipowerweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - mitvma.mit.edu X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sdalcorn.com Message-ID: <966157FC-F8AB-11D6-9988-000A27A90B06@sdalcorn.com> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 02:04:50 +1100 Reply-To: pic microcontroller discussion list Sender: pic microcontroller discussion list From: Sean Alcorn - PIC Stuff Subject: Re: [PIC]:failed data location? To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU In-Reply-To: <00b501c28cb2$632176c0$6501a8c0@potshe01.pa.comcast.net> X-RCPT-TO: Status: R X-UIDL: 277600681 X-Evolution-Source: pop://mailinglist%40farcite.net@mail.farcite.net/ X-Evolution: 0000077c-0000 > I would highly recommend using the industrial temp part and making > absolutely sure your supply cannot dip. And as Dale said, we will > always > have failures. I always hated building a few of something and getting > that > one part. Always casts a shroud of doubt on the design. There is not that much difference in price between "Industrial" Temp and "Extended" Temp versions. We only use extended temp PICs in our applications for this reason. Cheers, Sean -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.