From PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU Fri Nov 15 07:00:30 2002 Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id AC0E11A900F6; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:00:30 -0800 Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.007DC17C@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 9:46:23 -0500 Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 3095 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:31:59 -0500 Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 0647; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:30:12 -0500 Received: from smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via TCP with ESMTP ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:30:11 EST X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by smtp.comcast.net Received: from ScottTouchton (pcp02285524pcs.potshe01.pa.comcast.net [68.83.254.213]) by mtaout03.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 1.5 (built Sep 23 2002)) with SMTP id <0H5M00ID7GA8T5@mtaout03.icomcast.net> for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:30:12 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <00e001c28bfc$d5792120$0a01a8c0@djm> <000501c28c18$83fc02b0$0300a8c0@main> <000e01c28c37$65405500$0a01a8c0@djm> <000801c28c46$063aa060$6501a8c0@potshe01.pa.comcast.net> <001001c28cb1$b79cc5c0$0a01a8c0@djm> Message-ID: <00b501c28cb2$632176c0$6501a8c0@potshe01.pa.comcast.net> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:22:11 -0500 Reply-To: pic microcontroller discussion list Sender: pic microcontroller discussion list From: Scott Touchton Subject: Re: [PIC]:failed data location? To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU X-RCPT-TO: Status: R X-UIDL: 277600672 X-Evolution-Source: pop://mailinglist%40farcite.net@mail.farcite.net/ X-Evolution: 00000773-0000 > > Thanks for your input, Scott. I just don't feel comfortable that I'm out of > the woods by just replacing the chip. > I would highly recommend using the industrial temp part and making absolutely sure your supply cannot dip. And as Dale said, we will always have failures. I always hated building a few of something and getting that one part. Always casts a shroud of doubt on the design. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.