From PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU Thu Nov 14 02:41:42 2002 Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109] by dpmail10.doteasy.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id ADE613F80068; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 02:41:42 -0800 Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <7.007D3B38@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 5:27:53 -0500 Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 1064 for PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:09:58 -0500 Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 3531; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:00:36 -0500 Received: from nameserv.rl.ac.uk [130.246.135.129] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via TCP with ESMTP ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:00:04 EST X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by nameserv.rl.ac.uk Received: from sstdwkiwi (sstdwkiwi.ag.rl.ac.uk [130.246.189.231]) by nameserv.rl.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA29733 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:00:04 GMT References: <000001c28b9f$ad6da460$62c6fea9@default> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: <00da01c28bc4$9b277360$e7bdf682@sstdwkiwi> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:00:04 -0000 Reply-To: pic microcontroller discussion list Sender: pic microcontroller discussion list From: "Alan B. Pearce" Subject: Re: [OT]: Standard contract for work? To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU X-RCPT-TO: Status: R X-UIDL: 277600425 X-Evolution-Source: pop://mailinglist%40farcite.net@mail.farcite.net/ Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Evolution: 00000692-0000 > So, here am I faced with the prospect of coming up with some >sort of contract for some work I will be doing. Does anyone >here have a standard type of contract they are willing to share? >Or, at least some sort of outline of things that should be covered? > > Any discussion would be appreciated. I figure this may also >be something good to have on piclist.com or at least in the >archives (there is some discussion, but no templates or lists) >for the begining contracter. There have been good threads on this in the past. Look for a thread called "Contracting job gone wrong" which started as a [PIC]: topic, and became [OT]: as it went into various means of recovering unpaid fees. This thread was back in Feb 2002. I am sure there was another good thread on clauses to put into contracts, but it may all be in this same thread, as I have archived on a small portion of the thread. -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics