It won't be any problem...

I will simply have three versions of the software.  A, B and C grade.
They will be the same, but A will be as is, B will be timed for +5% and C
will be timed for -5%.
This won't cause any problems as I will need to test each finished board
anyway and programm it with the customers data.  Thus, selecting one of the
three programms and labeling the board won't cost me more than 30 seconds.

Besides, since I can't use MCLR as input because I use LVP, then I have no
other choice.  I simply don't have enough IO's if I don't skip the ext osc.

    Kyrre


----- Original Message -----
From: "Olin Lathrop" <olin_piclist@EMBEDINC.COM>
To: <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: How is the stability of the 16F628's internal oscillator
?


> > What do you know!!!  It does!
> > I've established that it works at temperatures way abowe what I will
> ever be
> > submitting it to.
> > Now if it only works with the ioce cube :-)
> > /me getting ice :-)
> > Well... Looks like it's working.
>
> Great.  One chip tested.  Now you have to repeat this proceedure for every
> chip you ship.  Better get busy.
>
>
> *****************************************************************
> Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts
> (978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
> [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads