Mike, seems to me that '628 and 18Fxx  have a different use...
The '628 is more similar to the '84 (and also the price/size is different
from18Fxx series). 2Kbyte program space is the double than 84's memory and I
think that many "enhancenments" to the code may be made. I have ported the
code of my datalogger from '84 in '628 and it works fine, with only little
changes due to the structural difference (however, I'm sure that 18F242 is a
good chip).

regards
Marco

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Singer" <msinger@POLUOSTROV.NET>
To: <PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: 16F628


> Sid Weaver wrote:
> > I've been thinking about switching to the 16F628 in
> > place of the old dependable 16F84A.
>
>    Consider switching to the 18F242 and later to 18F1220.
>
>  Mike.
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
> ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body