Thanks, sorry for the confusion, I meant RB4.

  anyway, am I correct to assume the timer (in timer mode fed from osc.)
  is always running as soon as you tell it it is in timer mode ?

  Regards,
  Ronald

On 2002.11.04 21:24 Jinx wrote:
> >    I need to control the timer0 state (running/stopped). is there a
> > smarter way than reassigning input to INT (and preventing  INT
> > from changing level in hardware) ?
>
> Hi, INT has no connection with Timer0. Timer0 in count mode
> is clocked by transistions on RA4 / T0CKI.
>
> But you can make RA4 behave like INT by setting Timer0 to FF
> and clocking it to generate a T0 overflow interrupt. Then reload
> Timer0 with FF for the next one
>
> (Don't forget RA4 pull-up and pre-scaler assignment)
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
> (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics