Peter L. Peres wrote:

> Ok, I will check. Although I have no idea what or who Jaycar is.

Thats why I said "jaycar.com.au" earlier in
the same post. :o)


>> *>I also have a good RLC bridge
>
> I do not aggree. A bridge is THE instrument to measure L and C with.

You're kidding right?? You think it's better
to have to turn a knob until you see it "peak"
then have to read the inductance based on the
knob position?? Better than just seeing the
inductance on a meter? Now I know you don't
have thousands of inductors in a tub like I do.


> *>Surely all it needs is an oscillator using the
> *>inductor under test, and an analogue meter showing
> *>freq which is then calibrated in uH??
>
> The scale would be a square root one.

Huh?? So if you have an oscillator where the
inductor is the timing component and you double
the inductance the freq does what?
-Roman

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.