On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, [iso-8859-9] =D6mer Yalh=FD wrote:

> Hi Vasile,
>
> Nice to hear from you again.  The reason I am considering RF is because
> it is a lot cheper and less complicated than the cable alternative and
> less risky.  After we have talked I have postponed the project and
> research a better and hopefully cheaper alternative.  The company
> (company that puts the parts on the pcb's I don't know what they are
> called) we work with here is going to provide me the transievers very
> (VERY!) cheap so that it makes the cable mess not worth while.  However

  If the module are soo cheap, are you interested to send me for free,
two transiever modules, just to consolidate the friendship relation
between us ? :)

Thanks, and best wishes, any answer will be,
Vasile











>
> Omer, I'm happy you have evoluted to RF ! :)
> I think you have to switch the frequency to every repeater because you
> will not be able to built and mount such good antennas to avoid the
> "biting effect" between reception and transmision. I suggest for your
> application ( if it's the same ) to check also the X10. It might work
> for appartments supplied from the same mains phase. Replicating your
> transmitter on 3 phases, I think will work. Anyway X10 repeaters are
> cheapers than whole authorisations you might need for wireless.
>
> best regards and success !
> Vasile
> http://www.geocities.com/vsurducan
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
> [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads