>This is a nice idea, but again tends to have limited usefulness outside the >geek community. But, we're all geeks here, right? > > I, personally, use 2048-bit encrypted email to anyone who can recieve it. I > > do this for two reasons: the first is that I do care a bit about my > > privacy, and the second... > > >Your email is not encrypted using 2048 bits. The PGP plugin generates a >message key and encrypts it once for each recipient with the 2048-bit >assymetric algorithm. Your actual email text is encrypted using a symmetric >algorithm, usually 3DES these days. This is for two reasons. Firstly, if you >used the assymetric algorithm to encrypt the email, you would have to have a >full copy for each recipient. Not good if you're sending a 1M pdf to 100 >people. Secondly, the assymetric algorithms are 100's of times slower than >3DES. This is more of an issue in real-time encryption, but still holds for >email. Not quite. PGP allows the use of CAST, IDEA, and 3DES. I'm set to CAST right now. [snip] > > So, A) If enough people use encrypted email on a regular basis, then > > encryption cannot be declared a tool of terrorists, and B) I don't want > > people snooping in my private email. > > > > I know I'm a bit of a conspiracy theorist, but, I think it's healthy to > have > > some skepticism as to the trustworthyness of email, and PGP gives a good > > step in the right direction. > > >That's the whole thing behind PGP right? The problem is that you and me doing >it doesn't really make a difference. The governments were really swayed by >commercial pressure from large networking equipment and software vendors >who are >increasingly offering virtual private networking services which (often) rely >on encryption to provide their services. If a very large percentage of the geek community were to use it, they could not deny the fact that others than terrorists used the technology. --Brendan -- http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu