> As far as I can see they are totally different. A conventional signature
gives
> some info about titles/phone numbers etc and a PGP signature provides a
method
> of authenticating the sender of a message. It's debatable how well PGP
does
> this outside of closed trust frameworks, in any case I don't see why a
post to
> the piclist should require non-repudiatable authentication of the sender.

I will reply to this on the [OT]: channel, as it has obviously passed the
bounds of [EE]: now.

--Brendan

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body