> Please remember that not everybody subscribes to the [OT]: channel.
> I don't and I'm sure a lot of others don't. Don't take this the wrong way.
> The good that comes from the PicList far outweighs the bad. :-)
> Plain text with no VC cards, etc does seem to be the preferred way
> of posting to the PicList.

I realise that not everyone subscribes to [OT]:  But, I would have thought
that there wouldn't be a problem when the list's admin said it was fine.
PGP signatures are in plain text.  They take less space than some of the
normal signatures I've seen, and they are generally out of the way, where
you don't have to look at them.  I didn't think it was a problem.  No one
who was on the [OT]: channel at the time said it was a problem.

I still don't see the real difference between having a PGP signature and a
conventional signature.  I see some far larger things to be concerned about
if you want to go correcting people's list behaviour.  For instance, the
lack of trimming on many replies.

--Brendan

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.