Well unfortunately, my ISP, DCA.NET, says that their web based
mail program will put my email address in the "reply to" field
even if I leave it blank. Hate to change ISP's, although
I occasionally use PINE as I have a Unix shell account.
Anyone know if Pine can be configured not to value the
reply to field or is it implementation dependent ?

Thanks,
Kevin

>> If at all possible, you should leave your Reply-To address empty.  The
>> list server will automatically set the Reply-To address to direct replies

>> to the list.  The server will not replace anything in the Reply-To field,

>> so your best bet is to simply leave it blank.
>>
>> It is very rare to actually need a Reply-To address.  The only time you
>> really need it is when for whatever reason your sent mail carries an
>> incorrect From: address.  This can result from a misconfigured host or a

>> poorly set up mail server, but 99% or more of the time you really don't
>> need it, and it can cause problems in situations like this.  So if you
>> can, just leave it blank.
>
>        The only time I ever needed to use the reply-to address was with an
ISP
>that didn't let you send mail with any address but the ISPs given mail
>address in the 'to' field. I used the reply-to to redirect the responses to

>the address I wanted. Of course, I dropped that ISP a couple months after
>they implemented that stupid idea. TTYL
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
>(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics