Brendan Moran wrote:
> I have to thank you for this.  It helped me figure out the ...
.
> You're right, mike,...
.
> I'll accept that...
.
> Now, with that little criticism (sorry 'bout that) I will say that
> you're probably right...
.
> But, thanks to you, I finally have figured out how to ...
.
> Once again, thanks, Mike, and saying that my weightings produced a
> result that was too uniform is a valid point...



 Thanks Brendan, but I'm fully perplexed with the amount
Of your " thanks". I can't handle this style of postings.
I've got into the habit to communicate in Olin's and even
more aggressive manner.


> But I would like to know if you tested your random
> number generator's randomness first, and if so,
> how did you test it, and how you define "good enough".

I'll think and reply this question later.

 Mike.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads