Ok, that's what I thought, but I needed to idiot check myself.

Thanks Dale :)

Josh

Dale Botkin wrote:
>
> Yes.  I've done it a lot both ways (627 -> 628 and 628 -> 627), as long as
> you're under 1K of program memory you're OK.  Everything else is the same,
> even RAM.
>
> Dale
> ---
> We are Dyslexia of Borg.
> Fusistance is retile.
> Your ass will be laminated.
>
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Josh Koffman wrote:
>
> > Ok, this should be easy, but if I have some precompiled code for a
> > 16f627, can I just go ahead and program a 16f628 with it with no
> > modifications? I've been working too long on this and my brain is
> > addled. I need a reality check :)
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
> mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu

--
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools.
        -Douglas Adams

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
mailto:piclist-unsubscribe-request@mitvma.mit.edu