Would it be possible to move the thread OT as soon as it stops being
relevant to PICs ?

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Mike Singer wrote:

>Russell McMahon wrote:
>^ For instance, Mike has on several occasions taken almost exactly the
>^ opposite meaning from my posts that I intended. This is sometimes my
>fault
>^ for using language jargon (as it were) which is likely to really be
>well
>^ understood only via very competent English speaker. But on some past
>^ occasions its come as quite a surprise.
>
> Russell,
> I can't agree that "I have taken almost exactly the opposite
>meaning from your posts". I just have tried to show that
>"opposite meaning" could be easily derived from your posts
>for many non "very competent English speakers" - PICList
>members.
> As for me, I hope, I felt the mood of your postings and
>approximated  missed points when sometime didn't grasp
>exact meaning.
>
> Mike.
>PS:
>   Thank you for the support when discussing beginner's PICs.
>
>--
>http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
>ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body