On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Scott Dattalo wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Peter L. Peres wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Alan B. Pearce wrote:
>>
>> >>My major gripes with MPLAB has always the 16-bit code, the clunky
>> >>simulator (although I do use it once in a while), the AWFUL support for
>> >>3rd party compilers -- especially source level debugging in C. Some may
>> >>say it's not realistic to ask Microchip to support 3rd party tools,
>> >>BUT...
>> >
>> >I cannot understand why they have not caused the Borland compiler they use,
>> >to produce 32 bit code. Perhaps Microchip have been developing MPLAB on Win
>> >3.1 machines :))
>>
>> Thank the powers that be that they haven't because 16 bit MPLAB runs fine
>> under Linux/Wine by grace of this "fault" ... until the GNU tools will be
>> integrated properly <duck behind large flame shield>.
>
>>From who are you fearing flames: MChip, the GNU developers in general, the
>GNUPIC developers, or Wine?

Esp. GNU fanatics ;-)

Peter

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body