> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan B. Pearce [SMTP:A.B.Pearce@RL.AC.UK]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 11:34 AM
> To:   PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject:      Re: [PIC]: Is MPLAB Junk?
>
> >My major gripes with MPLAB has always the 16-bit code, the clunky
> >simulator (although I do use it once in a while), the AWFUL support for
> >3rd party compilers -- especially source level debugging in C. Some may
> >say it's not realistic to ask Microchip to support 3rd party tools,
> >BUT...
>
> I cannot understand why they have not caused the Borland compiler they
> use,
> to produce 32 bit code. Perhaps Microchip have been developing MPLAB on
> Win
> 3.1 machines :))
>
Unfortunatley turning a 16bit app into a 32bit one isn't as simple as
setting a compiler flag!

Regards

Mike

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body