> >2.    Yes & no. I consider that New Scientist is a good source of
Scientific
> >knowledge
>
> Recent articles in New Scientist about my research field have been wildly
> inaccurate and misleading to the extent that I seriously doubt that the
> person who wrote the articles had any real knowledge of the field.
> For this reason I regard it as being more a tabloid than a source
> scientific knowledge.

Sad to hear.
What is your field of research?
What was the general nature of the inaccuracies?



        Russell McMahon

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.