All,

 Everyone brings up some good points and I understand what is being said.
 But I still maintain that HLL's for PIC's isn't necessarily a saving
 grace.   I might bring out my HLL's and try them again, but I really do
 believe I'll go back to assembler.   Maybe I'm a glutton for punishment,
 I don't know.  But I feel more comfortable with assembler.  I like taking
 care of the details.   But I'll try the other once more and see.

 Just so you all know, most of the applications I write are relatively
 small.   A couple hundred lines at most.  So my perspective for using
 assembler isn't the same as some of you all that write several hundred
 to a few thousand lines of code.

 Thanks to all for the discussion.


                                                  Regards,

                                                    Jim




>> - because of a vaste amount of predefined routines supporting
>> the built-in peripherials
>
> Ever wondered why we don't have a compareable set of routines in
> assembler? (Hint: unsused code elimination? Register (RAM) sharing?)
>
> Wouter van Ooijen
>
> -- ------------------------------------
> http://www.voti.nl
> PICmicro chips, programmers, consulting
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
> ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.