> I think rejection is the only "fair" way to do this,
> unless you want to do a division/scaling of 1024 -> 1000.
> The smartest solution would be to use 1024 element table,
> but maybe that is not possible?

"Ordinary" people aren't wired up like us. Convincing the user
to set a table size of 25,088 instead of 25,000 because it's
mo' easy for me to count to 6200h rather than 61ABh would
go down like a cup of cold sick.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.