>>    "Good information on possible reasons
>>     for the fact that childhood cancers are
>>     well known to be statistically significantly
>>     higher along power line routes."

> This could be just another case of so-much "Looking for answers
> in all the wrong places."

Have a glance at the page I referred to. My above statement would be
sticking my neck way out if this was just another mumbo-jumbo quackery page.
The page addresses your points and many many more besides. It doesn't
necessarily provide hard answers - it provides good information, as I said.
Sometimes "good information" consists of more questions.

I meant  ***** GOOD INFORMATION *****.
Read it (!)

I'll requote what I said that suggests it may be worth glancing at the page
before hazarding an opinion on its worth -

Very well worth looking at if one has any real interest in the subject.


                Russell McMahon


_________________

Superb FAQ on this subject.
Maintained by Dr John Moulder, a Professor of Radiation Oncology at the
Medical College of Wisconsin.

        http://www.mcw.edu/gcrc/cop/powerlines-cancer-FAQ/toc.html#21B

Very well cross indexed.
Tries desperately hard (if not totally successfully) to be balanced and
impartial in approach - much more so than most.

Good coverage of mechanisms and potential confounding factors.

Good information on possible reasons for the fact that childhood cancers are
well known to be statistically significantly higher along power line routes.
__________________________

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body