Thanks for all the response on this one. I didn't think the ad like message was bad it just gave me another option for solving my problem. Jim -----Original Message----- From: James Paul To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU Date: Monday, June 03, 2002 6:51 AM Subject: [PIC]: Re: pic 2 spi eeprom > All, > > If you want my opinion, (and even if you don't) I think there was nothing > wrong done here. He was answering a question that was posted, and in the > process let it be known that he done that sort of thing. Just a mention > of it though, not a long spiel. I think it was just fine. > > Regards, > > Jim > > > > >>> > This seems more like an [AD]: message than a [PIC]: message. ;-) >>> Sorry you were offended, but I don't think this stepped over the line >> >> I think an add-like *response* is not crossing the line, and notice the >> ;-) >> >> Wouter >> >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different >> ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. > >-- >http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different >ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details. > > > -- http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.