Given the huge amount of 'strange' files that Microsoft C produces and
the time it takes to compile I've stayed with Delphi for quickie Windows
apps.  I've had to do some in both Microsoft generic C in DOS boxes and
also C++ as Windows Apps.  I'll take Delphi any time for convenience.
Compiles that finish before I lift my hands from the keyboard make
testing just fly.

John Dammeyer


Wireless CAN with the CANRF module.
http://www.autoartisans.com/documents/canrf_prod_announcement.pdf
Automation Artisans Inc.
Ph. 1 250 544 4950


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pic microcontroller discussion list
> [mailto:PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of Roman Black
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:01 AM
> To: PICLIST@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: [OT]: Best small windows developer platform??
>
>
> Hi everyone, i'm looking for some advice. For years
> i've coded in Turbo C and some PC assembler, and
> now finally accepting that I need to start coding
> windows apps that run on other peoples computers. :o(
>
> Now after looking at C++ Builder and C# etc, it seems
> they are over complex and web-obsessed. I don't want
> to code large web databases, just small fast tools
> that run under windows and preferably small stand alone
> .exe files, that draw graphics (charts etc) to the
> screen and control pins on the parallel port etc.
> I've always coded up simple tools where I can connect
> a PIC or other circuit to the par port and chart/measure
> timing on inputs and outputs etc.
>
> I've been playing with Delphi, the free 6.0 version,
> but not real happy with that either. Any suggestions
> from those of you that code up small simple tools?? :o)
> -Roman
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
> email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
>
>
>
>

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body