At 08:09 AM 3/19/02 -0600, you wrote:
> > printf(lcd_putc,"value in memory is %02x",NUMBER);
>
>Now I'm confused.  Do you mean fprintf?  If so, what C compiler are you
>using where a FILE * is the same as a function pointer?  Or does your
>compiler have a "different" implementation of printf that can take an
>"optional" first argument specifying a putchar type routine to be used for
>the output?

Isn't this a good argument for more standardization in C compilers?

I've got nothing against them implementing a function like this, but
calling it printf is not right.

Best regards,

Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
9/11 United we Stand

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics